The Downside to Compact Fluorescent Bulbs

Seven Problems with CFL Bulbs Prevent Wider Acceptance and Use

9 Comments
Join the Conversation
Downside to compace fluorescent bulbs - JoeyGil
Downside to compace fluorescent bulbs - JoeyGil
Compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) are the light bulbs of choice for saving energy and money on utilities. But several drawbacks are forcing some to look for other options.

No one doubts that fluorescent light bulbs are far more efficient than traditional bulbs, which waste about 90 percent of their energy on heat. Many people have significantly reduced their electric bills by switching to CFLs. But there are situations where CFLs are not the best option.

CFLs work on the principle of fluorescence. An electronic ballast in the base of the bulb generates an arc between two electrodes inside a glass tube filled with gas. The arc excites mercury atoms in the gas so that they give off ultra-violet (UV) energy.

Because the UV rays are invisible, bulb makers add a white phosphor coating to the inside of the glass. When the UV strikes the phosphor, it glows, or fluoresces, in the visible range of light.

CFLs and Mercury

One of the biggest reasons to buy CFLs is that because they use so little energy, they reduce overall emissions of mercury into the air from power plant smoke stacks. However, as noted above, all fluorescent bulbs contain a tiny bit of mercury, which is highly toxic.

A report by Yale University researchers in 2008 concluded that, depending on the state or country involved, the use of CFLs may actually increase total mercury released to the environment.

The reason is that power plants use different fuel sources, which release different amount of mercury into the air. In some locations that use cleaner coal, or that have few recycling options, the mercury leaked into the environment from landfilled CFLs could actually surpass the amount saved by using less electricity from power plants.

Cleanup and Recycling of CFLs

Although the amount of mercury in a CFL is much less than that in a can of tuna, CFLs are considered household hazardous waste. By law, they must be either be recycled or taken to an approved hazardous waste disposal site.

If a CFL breaks, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency website recommends special steps to follow for cleanup. These steps include airing out the room, putting all debris and cleaning materials into a sealed jar or double plastic bag, and avoiding the use of brooms or vacuum cleaners that might stir mercury into the air.

In addition, the Maine Department of Environmental Protection website recommends disposing of the carpet, rug or bedspread on which a CFL breaks. It also suggests that CFLs might not be appropriate in rooms used by infants, small children or pregnant women, who are more susceptible to mercury poisoning.

Many hardware stores and local disposal sites accept CFLs for recycling, and some companies now sell pre-paid shipping boxes addressed to recycling plants. Unfortunately, not everyone has easy access to these options, so about three out of four CFLs end up in landfills, where the mercury gets leached into the soil and groundwater.

CFLs on Dimmer Switches

Many homes today contain dimmer switches. Using these switches saves energy by reducing the amount of power needed for lighting. But most CFLs do not work on dimmer switches, and may actually damage this kind of switch.

Some light bulb companies make CFLs that work on dimmer switches, but they are more expensive and often disappointing. They don't dim smoothly, but drop down in just a few, abrupt steps.

CFLs Don't Look Natural

Fluorescent lights normally give off blue-tinted light, whereas incandescent bulbs give off a yellowish light. Some people may not feel comfortable in the "atmosphere" of CFL bulbs. To reduce this effect, manufacturers are now offering CFLs in a color range of warm to neutral to cool.

Another problem with CFLs is that they don't show objects in their true colors. Bulbs are graded by their color-rendering index (CRI), with a grade of 100 being the color an object appears in daylight. Incandescent bulbs have a CRI of near 100, but CFLs are often graded with a CRI of 85 to 90.

Not all settings require a perfect CRI, and in many cases the color won't make much difference. By trying CFLs marked as either "warm" or "neutral," the blue color of CFLs might be avoided.

CFLs in Cold Climates

CFLs don't work well outdoors in cold weather. During the winter they take a long time to warm up to full power in garages, porches and outdoor light fixtures. CFLs are now labeled with their lowest operating temperature, and some are made especially for cold locations.

CFLs may not save as much energy in cold climates because they don't produce much heat. According to a study by the Canadian Centre for Housing Technology, houses with five CFLs replacing incandescent bulbs will have an increase in energy costs for heating in winter.

In summer, the study showed, CFLs significantly reduce power requirements for air conditioning. So although they do have a positive affect on total energy use throughout the year, lighting savings with CFLs are reduced because of the extra amount of power needed for heating.

For more information, see CFLs Can Cause Physical Symptoms.

For consumers who want to save energy and money, even where CFLs won't work, find energy saving alternatives to CFLs here.

Holly B. Martin, Larry Wilder dba Bison Webs

Holly Martin - Holly B. Martin's blog, www.scienceshift.com explores the world of science beyond the fringe.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 6+3?

Comments

Jan 8, 2010 5:49 PM
Guest :
An excellent, quality, well researched summary of the main drawbacks to Compact Fluorescent lamps, that are being foisted upon the world wide public without education, on this drawbacks, and only limited choice.
A newly available alternative I recently purchased is Halogen lamps in a bayonet fitting, and I would recommend these over CFL's or having to change your light fittings.
Mar 2, 2010 9:00 PM
Guest :
While there are some valid drawbacks to fluorescent bulbs, they are still a better alternative to incandescent bulbs or halogen bulbs. Both halogen and incandescent lighting loses much of the energy put into it as heat. This heat is not only wasted energy, but it poses a fire hazard. Fluorescent lighting on the other hand remains much cooler while providing light; this means higher efficiency and lower risk. There is mercury present in all fluorescent bulbs, but with some common sense precautions contact with this harmful chemical can be eliminated. Hopefully, in the next decade it will become cost effective to replace current lighting methods with LEDs which are much more efficent with much less risk. At this time, even the most efficient bulbs are only about 20% efficient.
Mar 26, 2010 4:58 AM
Guest :
Aside from Holly Martin's Luddite orientation and introduction of irrelevancies such as incompatibility of 1st generation CLFs with dimmer switches into the conversation, this is somewhat useful information. It is not ignorable that CFLs require only a fraction the electricity of regular incandescent light bulbs; the benefits far outweight the problems Martin cites. LED lighting is still more economical and environmentally friendly, but the purchase cost is still high.
Apr 28, 2010 5:49 AM
Guest :
Misses the main drawback of CFLs, unreliability!
Jun 30, 2010 2:17 PM
Guest :
As an experienced user of CFLs I think it is reasonable to point out that there are some design issues with these bulbs that, to the best of my knowledge cannot be fixed...this is not a recommendation NOT to use them but at least to be aware.

1) CFL light output deteriorates with time with at least two immediate problems. First, when the light output falls below what you consider acceptable then you will be replacing them prematurely and you will lose out on the promised economic benefits...and in my experience CFL light output is barely adequate when new. Second, when the first light in a room with several lights fails, the replacement bulb will be noticeably brighter...that drives my wife nuts particularly in the kitchen where the lights are on a lot. I end up replacing every bulb when one goes bad. Luckily I have a scheme to deal with the remaining operable, but down on power, bulbs...I move them to another room where the light output is not so critical. Still it is a definite hassle and extra expense as I have a collection of partly used bulbs that will probably never be put back into service...I wonder how this skews the statistics on bulb consumption and use as I'm sure I'm not the only one with this issue.

2) If you use the bulbs outside, for example in porch lights as I do, be aware that they produce very little heat...this sounds good and of course is a large part of why they are more efficient than an incandescent bulb...however, in an outdoor application the light attracts bugs (in my area wasps and mud daubers) to create nests inside the light fixtures...there is no heat to dissuade them! So, every year I have to remove the bulbs, kill the pests (have to buy insecticide) take the fixtures apart (or remove them) , clean them out, and reinstall the fixtures...major hassle.

One further point - despite claims to the contrary, even recently purchased bulbs with major manufacturer labels do not last to their expected life. Not to be totally negative on these things - I am using plenty of them in my house - the best application in my opinion are can lights where you can get reasonable light (still not as good as halogens) without the heat and where the bulbs are ON a lot. In my house my office is above the kitchen in which there are 9 cans. In the summer I use CFLs which reduce heat load through the floor to my office and keep it more comfortable (and probably reduce my AC bill a little) and in the winter I put the halogens in and they heat my office...I can actually turn all other heat off upstairs (no kids at home anymore) and be warm enough...
Jul 28, 2010 9:39 AM
Guest :
Regular light bulbs are still the safest way to go.
Sep 28, 2010 3:31 PM
Guest :
What are some more downfalls on the CFL lightbulb?
Feb 24, 2011 2:36 PM
Guest :
....
....Anyhow, I suspect that CFLs will be supplanted by LEDs in the next few years.

I bought an LED at Wallmart a few months ago for about $8. It has about 15 LEDs in it.
It's now in a desklamp and it has been burning steadily for 3 months. I never turn it off. It consumes about 2 watts.
It isn't as bright as a small CFL, but it is OK for reading at the desk.

And as far as that "toxic mercury" goes.. What a crock of crap. There is more mercury in one of my small tooth fillings - and I have a LOT of them! - than in 50 CFL bulbs.

"You broke a CFL? OMG! Clear the area! Ventilate! Run out of the house! Call in the HazMat team!"
What a load of shit. I just sweep up the broken glass and the practically invisible mercury and dump it into my garbage can.
Hey- let me know if you ever spot even one droplet of mercury in that pile of broken glass! The UV-coating on the inside of the glass is probably more toxic!

Where do they think Mercury comes from anyhow? Outer space? It comes from the GROUND!
Dust to dust etc. I'm sure there is more Mercury in one small Laurentian lake and its trout than there will ever be in the Miron dump!

Bah! A pox on these newly-expert "greenies", who flunked high-school chemistry - and who do not know the difference between elemental Mercury and its toxic organic compounds. I bet they could not name one of its compounds or indeed its Atomic symbol.
</rant>
Apr 12, 2011 2:57 PM
Guest :
I agree. The CFLs I bought at Costco a year ago stopped working.
9 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement